World leaders--again from both the developed and developing countries-- must show maturity and seize this opportunity. The US announcement that President Barack Obama will join the conference towards its end and recent pledges on numerical targets for emissions reduction by the world’s big greenhouse gas emitters -- US, China, India and Brazil-- have given a boost to the climate conference. But reaching a deal that everybody will own remains uncertain still. If a legally binding emissions target is not possible, countries should agree to voluntarily set targets and these can be converted later on into legally binding ones. The developed countries must also show magnanimity in offering aid to the poorer ones so that the latter can also contribute their part in emissions reductions. In any case, there must be tangible progress in Copenhagen or else the mammoth participation at the conference will turn out to have been a self-indulgence.
Since the UN’s climate conference in Stockholm in 1972 or the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and the Kyoto Protocol signed in 1997, we haven’t made much progress in saving the planet. Since 1992, global carbon-dioxide emissions have risen by a third. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a body constituted by the UN to establish a scientific consensus on the effects of climate change, has said world temperatures could increase in the range of 1.1-6.4ºC by the end of this century. If we are lucky, temperatures may rise by just less than two percent, but if they increase by over six percent we, as a species, are doomed. We must therefore recognize the long-term threat of climate change and not take comfort in the fact that there is no immediate danger attached to it.
Democracy was saved but hope is all we have