The pattern of the government’s response to reoccurring strikes in the education sector has become increasingly pathetic. It waits till the last minute by which time the problem grows into a full blown crisis such as complete paralysis of the schools due to protracted strikes, and then under tremendous pressure reaches a deal with the protestors and accedes to any demand, however irrational. The result: It fails to implement the deals, thus giving the protesters an excuse to launch yet another round of strikes, with additional demands.
That is exactly what happened this time also. NERF is right to say that it is just asking the government to implement past agreements but it is wrong to force the government to sign a deal that it could never implement. So an inept government and an irresponsible NERF were only fooling each other, and students and parents have been made to bear the brunt of their callousness and folly.
The three demands that NERF tried to push this time are unjustified to say the least. It demanded that all temporary teachers be made permanent through internal competition and begin a process to give permanent appointment to ‘relief-quota’ teachers. It also wanted to scrap the Company Act in the education sector. Temporary teachers, including those under the relief quota, are appointed mostly through political connections, with complete disregard for professional competence. Therefore, making them permanent simply means institutionalizing incompetence and political allegiance in education. Agreed that temporary teachers who have worked for years have acquired invaluable experience that gives them an advantage in their calling.
The government can and should take into account this experience factor and allocate some extra points to temporary teachers in the selection process. But to demand permanent positions for them on an automatic basis, shutting the door to free competition for fresh graduates, is unfair as well as unconstitutional. We also don’t understand why NERF wants to abolish the Company Act as it applies to the education sector. The Act requires profit making private schools to pay tax. A rational demand would be for strict tax enforcement on profit making schools, stringent regulation of their tax compliance and mobilization of that revenue to improve resource-strapped public sector education. What’s wrong with this idea? Finally, we encourage both the government and NERF to begin fresh negotiations with an open mind, throwing out the window all that has been agreed in the past, and strike a deal that is realistic and implementable.
The Do's and Dont's before buying a laptop