header banner

Right decision

alt=
By No Author
The Unified Communist Party of Nepal-Maoist (UCPN-M) has formally ended its over five-month-long House obstruction. Since the tabling of the budget for fiscal year 2009/10 on July 13 the House has remained disrupted, except for three days in the last week of November when the Maoists allowed a house meeting to pass that budget. The Maoists have said that they are agreeing to the House resumption since they are changing their mode of struggle for restoring civilian supremacy. Maoist leader Baburam Bhattarai has said that they will raise their issues in the House and do so in full conformity with the international norms of the parliamentary system. We welcome the Maoist decision. It has come late; nonetheless, it´s the right one.



Agreed, parliament is not the perfect place to solve each and every difference among the parties. Also, it is true parliamentary business can sometimes be messy and frustrating. But there can be no denying that it´s the most legitimate and representative body. If parliament is not the place to debate and resolve the pressing issues in the country, then there is no other place either. One of the problems of our democratic exercise has been our failure to uphold parliamentary supremacy. Either we have tried to bypass parliament over the most fundamental issues facing the country or a minority in the House has held parliament hostage for weeks on end. In the past too, when the UML was in the opposition it once obstructed the House for 57 days. Even the NC and other parties have done likewise for weeks. To obstruct the House for a few days to register a symbolic protest is one thing but to argue that a minority can legitimately block House proceeding indefinitely is to render the parliamentary system dysfunctional. This may sound like supporting a tyranny of the majority but we must accept that only the people have the right to punish the majority at the next general election.



Now that parliament has resumed, the parties should take all outstanding issues to the House floor and seek to resolve them there. The Constituent Assembly (CA) should also take up its business with urgency and sort out the differences over writing the constitution. We want to see the parties taking their proposals to the House or the CA on key issues such as integration/rehabilitation of combatants and the modality of the federation, among others. Trying to find solutions out of parliament or even outside the country, as suggested by the Maoists, will only undermine the sovereignty of the people and of the nation.



Related story

Desperate search for missing girls as nearly 80 dead in Texas f...

Related Stories
OPINION

Inclusive Election in Nepal

Vote_20221112094957.jpg
SOCIETY

What is the right to privacy? What is its arrangem...

PRIVACY_20230913144300.jpg
POLITICS

SC decision to overturn govt's plan to build Nijga...

RamChandraPoudel_20210916102623.jpg
ECONOMY

Decision to upgrade Satti small customs into main...

house.jpg
SOCIETY

Decision requiring govt employees to send their ch...

Decision requiring govt employees to send their children to community schools