It is fair to say that the world has changed significantly. It is in this context that the selection of the next Secretary-General (SG) is taking place. As the United Nations prepares to choose its next SG after more than seven decades of existence, the importance of its unique structure and processes cannot be overlooked. Discussions in the General Assembly and negotiations in the Security Council reflect the complex institutional architecture that has helped hold the world together so far.
This transition in leadership comes amid a period of considerable global uncertainty. Geopolitical rivalries are intensifying, the adverse effects of climate change are increasingly evident, and gaps between developed and developing nations remain pronounced. For countries that value peace, multilateral cooperation is not only an important choice but a necessity.
As the UN prepares to usher in a new leader on the 38th floor of its New York headquarters, there is much to learn from the history of this office. The experience of the previous nine Secretaries-General highlights the blend of diplomacy, politics, and moral authority required to balance national interests and global responsibilities.
Architecture of Endurance (1946–1961)
The early years of the United Nations focused on institution-building aimed at preventing another global catastrophe. Trygve Lie of Norway, the first Secretary-General, faced the challenge of defining a new office amid rising Cold War tensions. His tenure laid the foundation for the organization’s future development.
His successor, Dag Hammarskjöld of Sweden, transformed the office into a powerful instrument of diplomacy. Widely regarded as one of the most influential Secretaries-General in UN history, Hammarskjöld advanced the principle of preventive diplomacy and contributed significantly to the development of modern UN peacekeeping.
Butwal launches perspective development plan
A notable aspect of Hammarskjöld’s legacy in relation to Nepal is his visit in March 1959, the first visit by a UN Secretary-General to the country. This marked the growing participation of newly independent and developing nations in multilateral diplomacy. Nepal became a member of the United Nations on 14 December 1955.
Balancing Sovereignty and Global Interest (1961–1991)
As the UN expanded in membership and functions, its structure became increasingly representative of the international community. U Thant of Myanmar, the first Asian Secretary-General, led the organization through critical Cold War crises such as the Cuban Missile Crisis and the Vietnam War. His careful stewardship strengthened the credibility of the office during a volatile period.
U Thant’s connection with Nepal is particularly notable. During his visit in April 1967, he traveled to Lumbini, the birthplace of Lord Buddha. Deeply impressed by its cultural and spiritual significance, he supported international efforts to preserve and develop the site.
The subsequent tenures of Kurt Waldheim of Austria and Javier Pérez de Cuéllar of Peru emphasized diplomacy and consensus-building. Waldheim visited Nepal in February 1981, and Pérez de Cuéllar followed in March 1989. This era reflected the UN’s growing focus on mediation and negotiated conflict resolution.
Transition and Reform (1992–2016)
The end of the Cold War created both opportunities and challenges for the United Nations. Boutros Boutros-Ghali of Egypt responded with his landmark report An Agenda for Peace, strengthening the focus on preventive diplomacy, peacebuilding, and post-conflict reconstruction.
These ideas were further developed under Kofi Annan of Ghana, who prioritized UN reform, human rights, and development cooperation. The introduction of the Millennium Development Goals underscored the link between peace and development. During his visit to Nepal in March 2001, Annan highlighted the importance of sustainable development and international partnership for addressing the challenges faced by developing countries.
As globalization intensified, the UN’s role in addressing global challenges became more visible. Ban Ki-moon of the Republic of Korea placed climate change and sustainable development at the center of the global agenda. His tenure saw the adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Climate Agreement. During his visit to Nepal in late October and early November 2008, Ban emphasized Nepal’s democratic transition and visited Lumbini.
Modern Multi-Crisis Management (2017–Present)
The current Secretary-General, António Guterres, has led the UN through a period marked by geopolitical tensions, global health crises, economic instability, and climate risks. His tenure has emphasized sustainable development, climate action, institutional reform, and renewed commitment to multilateralism.
During his official visit to Nepal from 29 October to 1 November 2023, Guterres addressed a joint session of the Federal Parliament, expressing gratitude for Nepal’s contributions to UN peacekeeping operations. He also visited the Everest and Annapurna regions, witnessing firsthand the impacts of climate change in the Himalayas.
Looking Ahead
The history of the United Nations demonstrates that its success depends on both visionary leadership and strong member state commitment. The role of Secretary-General requires a rare combination of diplomacy, pragmatism, administrative skill, and dedication to the principles of the UN Charter.
As the selection of the next Secretary-General continues, the UN’s core mandate remains unchanged: maintaining peace, protecting human dignity, promoting sustainable development, and fostering international cooperation. Countries like Nepal, which have consistently supported multilateralism and international law, have an opportunity to reaffirm their commitment to the global order.
In an era of uncertainty and division, the incoming Secretary-General will face significant challenges. Nevertheless, the UN’s long history offers cautious optimism. The organization can continue to serve as a vital platform for dialogue and cooperation.
(Views expressed in this publication are independent of any organizational affiliation.)